FairTax holds answers to many of the country’s economic ills

Dear Mansfield Today Editor,
The FairTax is a proposal that would shift the tax base from our current system - one based on income - to a consumption-based, federal, retail-level sales tax on all new goods and services.
The FairTax eliminates a multitude of payroll and extravagant taxes and replaces it with a 23% consumption tax.
Also, the FairTax includes a monthly prebate - or a check from the government for the amount of money the individual or household spent in taxes on necessity items, according to the federally-determined poverty level. This prebate makes the FairTax progressive.
With the current economic recession, a proposal like the FairTax has the possibility of dramatically altering the economic future of the United States. Unfortunately, it’s not a well-known idea [but it] has supporters scattered all across the country. For those supporters, whose loyalty is never taken for granted, countless hours are dedicated to spreading the word about the FairTax.
FairTax Bill gaining support
The FairTax Bill introduced as H.R. 25 to the House of Representatives and S.1025 in the Senate, had 56 cosponsors in the 108th Congress, 61 in the 109th, 76 in the 110th, and now has 78 currently listed supporters (See: FairTax Scorecard). The Congressional support has been gaining momentum; all it needs is more grassroots publicity.
The FairTax eliminates, completely:
- individual income taxes,
- the alternative minimum tax (AMT),
- all corporate and business income taxes,
- the capital gains taxes,
- social security,
- Medicare,
- and all other federal payroll taxes,
- the self-employment tax,
- the estate tax,
- and gift tax.
These taxes are replaced with a 23% consumption tax.
Why is a proposal like the FairTax needed? An obvious answer is the current economic state of our country. The U.S. is in a deep recession with optimistic predictions of it devastating the U.S. economy at least another solid year.
Unemployment is rising, consumer confidence is down, and our GDP is far from a number to brag about.
The FairTax plan has the potential, if accepted by legislators, and the people, to turn America’s economic future around.
Also, the failure of our government-run social security and Medicare program is rapidly approaching, with social security projected to be depleted by 2040, and Medicare by 2018 (Sahadi). Huge numbers of the U.S. population are dependant on these programs - they need to be fixed, and quickly.
Help for businesses
Our current tax code has also stifled businesses, and discouraged successful business practices.
According to the current director of the Congressional Budget Office, “making ‘tax decisions’ rather than ‘economic decisions’ (that is, making decisions that will reduce your taxes rather than increase your income) is a practice that costs our economy 18% of our gross domestic product- a whopping $2 trillion loss in the GDP,” (Boortz…The FairTax Book, 49).
In an economic environment where businesses could make economic decisions rather than tax decisions in America, huge GDP growth would be seen.
The taxes forced upon businesses are passed along in the way of higher prices to consumers. These are known as “embedded taxes”.
As estimated by Dr. Dale Jorgenson, the former Chairman of the Harvard Economics Department, on average, consumers are already paying 22% embedded taxes in a wide range of industries at the cash register (Jorgenson). This means, basically, that prices after the FairTax would only rise slightly. And keep in mind, consumers [would] now have their entire paycheck, a major increase in household revenue.
Simplified taxes
Compliance costs associated with the current tax code are often not well publicized. “In 2005 the estimated time the average American spent on the process (filing individual income taxes) was up to 27 hours… This December report (from the Tax Foundation) calculates that 6 billion hours and $265 billion were spent to comply with the federal income tax in 2005,” (Boortz… The FairTax Book, 40,43).
All of this time and money is wasted because of an outrageously complicated tax code that IRS employees frequently mess up. “Since 1954 the number of words in our tax code has increased by nearly 500%, the number of words in the IRS regulations has increased by 939%,” (47).
The FairTax bill that includes both the code and regulations is only 132 pages long, compared to the over 60,000-page income tax, and is significantly simpler (Linder, Rep….).
More jobs
American companies are not globally competitive, because of the suffocating tax code. “If we were to pass the FairTax… we would be the only nation in the world whose companies could sell into a global economy with no tax component in the price system,” (Boortz… The FairTax Book, 65).
This means two specific and wonderful things for our economy. Companies will come to America, reversing out-sourcing. They will bring jobs and contribute to our economic boom. America will regain our leading status in the world. With the millions of jobs, comes higher wages, more money to spend - and higher revenue for the U.S. government.
The Comptroller General, David M. Walker, testified before the Full Committee of the House Committee on Ways and Means that, “By the year 2040 the entire federal revenue stream will be insufficient to pay just the interest on the federal debt,” (Boortz…FairTax: The Truth, 34). The FairTax will grow the economy and widen the tax base, and therefore raise tax revenues, at least buying the U.S. government time to figure out how to raise the money to run the country.
So many problems are addressed by the FairTax, attention needs to be brought to its immense potential to save America’s economic future.
Repeated studies prove the benefits of the FairTax are widespread and numerous. Dr. Jorgenson’s research analyzed the benefits of the FairTax, and his findings are fully in support of the proposal. According to his published study, “the NRST (national retail sales tax)… would have an immediate and powerful impact on the level of economic activity… GDP would increase by almost 10.5% in the first year. This increase would gradually decline to a little under 5.4% over the next 25 years,” (Jorgenson).
This 10.5% GDP growth is absolutely huge. Those are the kind of pre-recession numbers China has been pulling, demonstrating the massive economic growth occurring in the developing nation. Those are the kind of numbers America needs to reestablish its dominant position in the world - and the FairTax will deliver.
FairTax supporters see the need for a tax code that does not penalize success, but rewards it.
Although every tax proposal is imperfect, the FairTax has a wide range of benefits that would stimulate both short-term and long-term economic growth.
America needs something to drastically change its grim future, we are losing ground as the dominant force in the world. The FairTax can reverse this, and will - if given the chance.
Sincerely,
Britta Schletter
[Editor's note: Britta Schletter is an E.O. Smith High School student who has been studying and advocating for the FairTax solution, and who organized tonight's event. See: "What you should know about a Fair Tax" in Mansfield Today.]
Posted April 17, 2009
Works Cited
Boortz, Neal, and Congressmen John Linder. The FairTax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.
Boortz, Neal, and Congressmen John Linder. FairTax: The Truth, Answering the Critics. New York: HarperCollins, 2008.
FairTax Scorecard. 2008. Americans for Fair Taxation. 25 Dec. 2008.
Jorgenson, Dr. Dale W. The Economic Impact of the National Retail Sales Tax. 18 May 1997. 02 Jan. 2009.
Linder, John. “Rep. John Linder July 23, 2008 Statement on the FairTax.” Fairtax.org. 23 July 2008. Americans for Fair Taxation. 29 Jan. 2009.
Sahadi, Jeanne. “Social Security, Medicare to run out sooner.” 3 May 2006. CNN. 2 Jan. 2009.

























9 Responses to “FairTax holds answers to many of the country’s economic ills”
Thank you for an excellent summary! I am currently rebutting a family member’s misconceptions. I have FairTax: The Truth in my lap and your article on my monitor! Have you thought of going to other high schools (Columbia, Fulton) and presenting this program? I think it is essential that young men and women who soon will be voting understand that there really is hope and that there really is a choice in how this government is funded. Please consider taking this message to other schools. I am a retired educator who would like to see more young adults at the FairTax meetings.
Comment made on April 18th, 2009 at 2:05 pm[...] Reservations About the Fair Tax…Also, the FairTax includes a monthly prebate - or a check from the government for the amount of money the individual or household spent in taxes on necessity items, according to the federally-determined poverty level. … Read more [...]
Comment made on April 18th, 2009 at 6:34 pmSorry Mansfield, Fairtax is a Magic Pony.
Oh it sounds wonderful — but it’s literally a farce. For example, it pretends to get MOST government revenue FROM the government.
How’s that for Alice in Wonderland Mad Hatter nonsense?
Read the Fairtax Book, page 148, for example “The federal government ITSELF will become a MAJOR taxpayer.”
Notice how that’s hidden deep in the back — go read the passage. They drop this absurdity in the fine print, as an aside. It’s deliberately misleading.
Or– go see the Fairtax Answers the Critic Book — incredibly, it says (also in the fine print) that all state and local governments have to pay this 30% sales tax on all it spends -including PAYROLL expense.
That’s right - hidden deep down in the book, as an aside - they say PAYROLL will still be taxed for all government levels. Not the employees - for the government unit. Police departments, fire department, prisons, highway departments — etc etc, will have to pay 30% tax on PAYROLL and all other spending.
Here is a clue — people pay taxes. Fairtax has deliberately tried to fool people. Don’t believe a word of it. Google Fairtax absurdity.
Thank you
Comment made on April 26th, 2009 at 8:06 amExcellent letter. The Fair Tax IS the first major step we can take to make this nation fiscally sound. We’ve been headed to where we are for about 80 years. I am astonished at the naysayers gross minsrepresentation of the Fair Tax. One can only assume that they are well versed in the facts or research. Fair Tax is the most researched tax plan in history. Millions of dollars have gone into this research. Many noted economists support it. Our current tax code is literally destroying our tax base, forcing U.S. jobs to outsource to other countries. 3,000,000 manufacturing jobs are committed to returning to the U. S. with passage of the Fair Tax. America would become THE tax haven of the world, enabling over 11 trillion U.S. dollars to come back home. Now that’s stimulus, and change I can believe in.
Comment made on May 6th, 2009 at 4:30 pmMr. Douglas, get the facts from credible sources. I’m sure you’re well aware that you can google anything and you’ll get all kinds of info from God knows where. The discerning person will dig for those credible resources.
Comment made on May 6th, 2009 at 4:32 pmTo Beverly Martin,
I hope you get this post. The first Fair Tax billboard in Ohio went up around the Dayton area. More to follow.
Are you having regular Fair Tax meetings in your area? I’m assuming you’re from around the Richland Co. area in Ohio. There is a supporter in Shelby that needs to hook up with other like-minded people.
I’m in Marion and started becoming active in my support of the Fair Tax a couple of months ago. Visit us at fairtaxnation.com to become involved. It’s a great site where all fairtaxers can come together and plan strategies to strengthen support.
Congressman Tiberi is the only congressman in Ohio that supports the Fair Tax. We’re working on getting him to be more publicly open about it. Of course, we’re working on all elected officials in our state.
FTN is the place to go to learn of upcoming events.
Comment made on May 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am"Fair Tax" is a meaningless feel-good name for a regressive consumption tax.
I propose we name it "Rich People Love It Tax", or "The Middle Class Are Easily Confused Tax", or "The Investment Class Just Doesn’t Have Enough Money Already Tax".
Or, how about "The Working Class Will Swallow Anything Tax"?
All of these are more honestly descriptive than "Fair Tax".
Comment made on June 15th, 2009 at 10:01 pmThe only “fair tax” is lower taxes. Lower taxes leads to smaller government. Smaller government leads not to less services but simply services where they are needed the most.
Either through a crisis or through planning, government will have to get smaller because large governments always fail. Don’t believe me? Ask the Soviets how communism worked out for them.
Someday, government will be small, citizens will be responsible & future generations will wonder why we needed so many layers of bureaucracy to “protect” citizens who were quite capable of protecting themselves in the first place.
Comment made on July 23rd, 2009 at 3:13 pmA few points in response to the previous post:
1) The so-called "fair tax" isn’t about tax levels, it’s about tax distribution.
2) Your statement that "large governments always fail" could be generalized to: "all governments eventually fail", or even: "complex societies eventually fail"
In some cases, "failure" of an existing system is not such a bad thing. I wouldn’t mind if a lean, mean, highly efficient, terribly awful government failed; or if a society composed of a vast underclass serving an entrenched elite fell over to give way to something new. Not many people consider that the collapse of the Roman Empire actually led to an improved quality of life for a large number of people under its control.
Getting back to the cynically-named "Fair Tax": the problem is not large government specifically, but high concentrations of wealth and power regardless of how it’s institutionalized. A modest tax base distributed in a highly progressive way on both income AND wealth serves two functions: 1) by being modest, it keeps government power in check; 2) by being highly progressive, it keeps private concentration of power in check.
3) Some needs are not well-served by the private market. National defense, for example and, it seems, health care. Yeah, that’s right, I opened that can of worms. Bon apetit!
Comment made on August 5th, 2009 at 12:18 pmLeave a Comment